8/1/05

Brook Andrew

'Peace & Hope' Gabrielle Pizzi Gallery
Level 3, 75-77 Flinders Lane, Melbourne, July 2005
Brook-Andrew
Aboriginal boxer Anthony Mundine has been printed large on a poster. His image, chest and face, one bold signifier stretched out on the wall. Muscle, blackness, anger, pride, arrogance, violence, sport, identity, power, history. His image seems to provoke the discourses of contemporary Aboriginality. Mundine is both maligned and celebrated. A subject of conflict. On the internet I found something Mundine had written and it seemed to be what the image was saying, “I wasn’t outspoken and that back then. I didn’t have the confidence I have now.”.
Rob McKenzie
WinmarWilliams
see Lowe's comment related to these images
Brook-Andrew-02
see Ashley Crawford's comment

7 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anthony Mundine has lost his arms like a Greek statue in a fog or wash of art. Kind of crucifixion. I don't know too much about boxing. I feel like Im being confronted or accused by someone who is powerless. I want to know more.

3:30 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Geoff, don't waste your time. Mundine is a rather pathetic Ali impersonator without the wit or skills. When he lost his title bout, Australia cheered. True.

4:40 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

These times make it so easy to dismiss each other. I’ve got the time to waste on this it’s not as though I’m so busy that I can’t enquire more. I’m looking to know how the posted image on the left (Winmar) can be represented in our culture more than the one on the right (Williams). I’m not only interested in Mundine but what Brook Andrew is dealing with.
A sports administrator said about the sacked Mundine “We support free speech, but free speech to say that you approve the killing of innocent people, that is not free speech.” My only understanding is that Bush and Blair’s free speech has led to the killing of a lot of innocent people in two counties in recent times. It’s not so much I want to get into divisive banter about all this but more to consider a reality as a subject for art. To begin here to find a way of talking that doesn’t cover everything up.

1:47 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

For this latest series of silkscreens Brook Andrew
works the medium to its extremes. Graphic in extremis,
Andrew steals an old Andy Warhol tactic, layering the
work with diamond dust along with graphite and
Swarvoski Crystals, something Warhol did in the 1980s
with his Myths series. But while Warhol’s myths were
those of 20th Century American culture, Andrew’s
designs here incorporate a mythology of a very
different kind. He has taken on board designs from his
mother’s country, Wiradjuri in New South Wales. These
are designs that have been incorporated again and
again by the white fella in the kitsch representations
of Aboriginal culture seen on everything from
tea-towels to faked boomerangs and shields. In a
circular postmodern twist Andrew has in fact
essentially re-appropriated designs from his own
family’s lineage. The zig zag patterns represent a
distinct style of language. But Andrew has long been a
player of linguistics; the use of both Wiradjuri and
English words hail back to his earlier works created
in neon. But even with an element of the bitter,
Andrew tackles his subjects with aspects of humour and
wry amusement. For Andrew language is a weapon, at
times literally portrayed as ammunition, such as when
words as ‘Composer’ and ‘Kalmaldain’ are fired from
pistols. The overall effect is an optical tsunami,
part political poster reminiscent of the street
messages of Guy Debord and the Situationists, at other
times a more light-hearted pot-pouri of emblazoned
colour and word trickery that would make James Joyce
or William S. Burroughs proud.

4:36 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Come on Ashley, Art Collector isn't paying 45 cents a word for this pap: "For this latest series of silkscreens Brook Andrew works the medium to its extremes. Graphic in extremis..." Either it's an extreme that's already been met [and a limit], or it's not "extreme" at all. Leave off the hyperbole will you...

3:13 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

..of-course you can liken mundine to ali..or rather claim that mundine has appropriated an 'obvious influence'..but mundine isn't living in the large sub-set of anglo-australian 'normality'.
the lack of representation of non-anglo australians in the media and narrative arts means that every non-anglo australian who chances to be placed in the public eye or spotlight..will inevitably and inextricably be a spokesperson for his/her race/cultural group or mob...whether they like it or not.
mundine knows that he is a political figure...and as a black man, that makes him potentially dangerous.
in some cultures, the cutting off of arms is a 'silencing'.
to me, this piece has got me thinking about dismembered warriors, fallen gods, the spanish inquisition, biblical archetypes like samson..and other mythologies.
and yet it is not necessarily a passive allegorical piece. it's present-political.
i think brooks' 'the man' is as challenging as it is thought provoking - i like how brook fessed up to it being a 'happy accident'...just goes to show, maybe the process is 90% observation.

i like.

3:12 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

This is very interesting site... zithromax flu Port huron st. clair river cruise Pdr information on zoloft Girls with hairy legs com Wedding invitations by checkerboard Delong award jackets Understanding your verizon phone bill

2:02 AM  

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home